Features & Characteristics of Carbon Nano Fiber
Carbon Nano Fibers Features and Characteristics
-
Pyrograf®-III is grown completely in the gas phase, and tends to be grown in an entangled mass. It is now grown without any detectable pyrolytic overcoat. Pyrograf®-III may be properly referred to as a nanofiber. Pyrograf®-III is highly ordered without heat treatment (although heat treatment is still useful as a means of removing impurities, if desired).
-
Pyrograf®-IV is similar to Pyrograf®-III, but contains an additional pyrolytic overcoat so that it attains a diameter of a few microns. Therefore, it is not properly referred to as a "nanofiber" but actually becomes a "microfiber." Because of its larger diameter, Pyrograf®-IV can be considered as an additive for high thermal conductivity.
The properties of the three Pyrograf® types are summarized below (incidentally, ASI does not offer a material called Pyrograf®-II. It was abandoned in favor of Pyrograf®-III by the mid 1990s). It is not practical to measure single-fiber properties for very tiny fibers, but the strength, modulus, and CTE are inferred to be similar for all three materials (as measured for the case of Pyrograf®-I).
|
Properties of PYROGRAF® Materials |
Property |
Pyrograf®-I (PR-I-HT) |
Pyrograf®-III (PR-24-PS) |
Pyrograf®-IV |
Description |
macroscopic fiber |
nanofiber |
microfiber |
Ultimate Strength, GPa |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
Tensile Modulus, GPa |
600 |
600 |
600 |
Diameter, microns |
10 |
0.060 - 0.2 |
2,000 |
Length, microns |
1 to 10 cm |
100 |
100 |
Density, g/cm3 |
2.1 |
1.8 |
1.9 |
Pyrolytic layer thickness,
nanometers |
~500 |
~20 |
none |
CTE, ppm * |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
-1.0 |
Electrical Resistivity,
micro-ohm-cm |
55 |
55 |
55 |
Thermal Conductivity,
W/K-m |
1950 |
TBD |
TBD |
|
* Note that the coefficient of thermal expansion of these materials is slightly negative, in contrast to the polymer matrix, which usually expands significantly upon heating. Thermal expansion coefficient of polymer nanocomposites can be significantly reduced. Thus thermal strain is likely to be much lower in a polymer nanocomposite, which can be an important advantage for such materials.
|
|
|
|